A Paramedicine.com experiment in crowd-sourced peer-review - Adult Anaphylaxis Ariticle. Join in!
- Paramedicine.com
- Sep 5, 2020
- 1 min read
Hello everyone! We'd like to try something new with all of you and we hope you're interested. A team of us have authored a paper that is just about ready for publication. We've been reading a lot about what is called 'Crowd Sourced Peer Review', which involves sending out an article on social media before you submit it for publication and seeking feedback from 'the crowd'.
So we've attached the article as a pdf for you to have a look at ... if you'd like to. We'd love to hear your thoughts about it. We've created a post on the paramedicine.com Facebook webpage here: facebook.com/wwwparamedicine.com asking for you to give us your feedback.
So please consider this a formal invitation to have a look at our paper and offer any comments you want to. You don't have to read the whole thing, and you don't have to offer a detailed, comprehensive review. Let us know if it reads well. We'd like to know that. Let us know if think it's interesting or boring. Again - we'd love to hear whatever you have to say. We'll be watching our Facebook page and hoping to see some comments, so please don't be shy.
If you're curious, there's a fair bit of research and support for crowd-based peer-review. See for example: Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast
Crowdsourcing the peer-review process for pre-hospital guidelines is an excellent approach because clinical practice often reveals workflow constraints that traditional academic reviewers might overlook. Having field medics look over an adult anaphylaxis paper ensures the final algorithm is actually practical under pressure, rather than just theoretically sound. Managing these collaborative academic efforts across large groups requires strong organizational oversight, which is why professionals involved in updating medical policies could benefit from specialized training, such as contract management courses, to better handle the operational agreements and multi-institutional partnerships that come with public research initiatives. Bringing open science into paramedicine will definitely help close the gap between field realities and published literature.
Love the idea of opening up the peer-review process like this—anaphylaxis management is one of those topics where real-world paramedic input could catch gaps that academic reviewers might miss. I've been using https://ai-songgenerator.com
Reading through a crowd sourced review like this is a refreshing way to spot details that might otherwise be missed. Funny enough, I switched from reading about Cortéis to checking out Corteiz Madrid, Corteiz Clothes, Corteiz Nike, Cortiez, CRTZ XYZ, Cortez, and the Nike x Corteiz collection, and both communities seem to thrive on people sharing honest feedback.
Love seeing paramedicine lean into open peer review like this. Just downloaded the 606KB PDF and the adult anaphylaxis algorithm is a solid foundation. I've been using https://2d-to-3d.org
Love seeing the paramedicine community pilot crowd-sourced peer review like this—the adult anaphylaxis paper is a perfect candidate for real-world field feedback. I've been using https://banana-nano.co